TICA Default Tenancy Control Pty Ltd v Datakatch Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 815
TICA failed to prove that the respondents copied the source code, database schema or data, and although some HTML stylesheet code was copied, TICA did not prove that the copied material was a substantial part of the TICA software. The copyright infringement claim therefore failed. TICA did establish that Mr Anthony Nounnis took TICA client usernames and passwords and that he and Mr Joshua used them to access TICA's website for Datakatch's purposes, giving rise to breach of confidence and injunctive relief; Mr Anthony Nounnis also breached s 183(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Datakatch was liable to be restrained because Mr Joshua's knowledge, as sole director, was attributable to it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, and Breach of Fiduciary and Related Duties Proceeding / Reasons for Judgment After Hearing; Parties Ordered to Bring in Short Minutes of Order
- Outcome
- Copyright infringement claim failed; breach of confidence claim succeeded in relation to usernames and passwords; claim against Mr Anthony Nounnis under s 183(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) succeeded; claims against Mr Portelli and Datakatch International Pty Ltd dismissed; amendment application refused;...
- Legal Topics
- ['copyright Infringement in Computer Software and HTML Code' 'ownership of Copyright in Computer Programs' 'breach of Confidence in Usernames and Passwords' 'use of Position and Information Under Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Ss 181(1), 182(1), 183(1)' 'circumstantial Proof of Copying' 'substantial Reproduction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, and Breach of Fiduciary and Related Duties Proceeding / Reasons for Judgment After Hearing; Parties Ordered to Bring in Short Minutes of Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondents copied the TICA system, including source code, database schema, HTML stylesheets or data.' "Whether any copying amounted to reproduction of a substantial part of TICA's copyright work under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)." 'Whether TICA owned copyright in the TICA software.' 'Whether the use of TICA client usernames and passwords breached obligations of confidence.' 'Whether Mr Joshua or Mr Anthony Nounnis breached duties under ss 181(1), 182(1) or 183(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether Datakatch, Mr Portelli and Datakatch International Pty Ltd were liable.']
Ratio Decidendi
TICA failed to prove that the respondents copied the source code, database schema or data, and although some HTML stylesheet code was copied, TICA did not prove that the copied material was a substantial part of the TICA software. The copyright infringement claim therefore failed. TICA did establish that Mr Anthony Nounnis took TICA client usernames and passwords and that he and Mr Joshua used them to access TICA's website for Datakatch's purposes, giving rise to breach of confidence and injunctive relief; Mr Anthony Nounnis also breached s 183(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Datakatch was liable to be restrained because Mr Joshua's knowledge, as sole director, was attributable to it.
Court Disposition
Copyright infringement claim failed; breach of confidence claim succeeded in relation to usernames and passwords; claim against Mr Anthony Nounnis under s 183(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) succeeded; claims against Mr Portelli and Datakatch International Pty Ltd dismissed; amendment application refused;...
Orders
- ['The parties bring in orders giving effect to these reasons by Friday, 29 July 2016.' 'The matter be stood over for further directions on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 9.30am.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment