Tidy Tea Limited & Anor v Unilever Australia Limited [1995] FCA 589

Tidy Tea Limited & Anor v Unilever Australia Limited [1995] FCA 589

The applicants made out a serious question to be tried as to infringement and validity of their petty patent, and the balance of convenience favoured interlocutory relief since the respondent marketed with full knowledge of the claim; accordingly, an injunction will issue to restrain continued marketing of the allegedly infringing product, pending the bringing in of appropriate orders.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 August 1995
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction for Patent Infringement / Interlocutory
Outcome
Interlocutory injunction granted. Applicants to bring in short minutes of order.
Legal Topics
['interlocutory Injunctions' 'patent Infringement' 'patent Validity' 'obviousness' 'anticipation' 'balance of Convenience']
['intellectual Property' 'patents'] ['interlocutory Injunctions' 'patent Infringement' 'patent Validity' 'obviousness' 'anticipation' 'balance of Convenience']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Interlocutory Injunction for Patent Infringement / Interlocutory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there is a serious question to be tried regarding infringement of the petty patent' 'Whether the claim construction includes the allegedly infringing product' 'Whether prior art anticipates or renders the patent obvious' 'Whether the claim is ambiguous, not fairly based or obtained by false suggestion' 'Whether balance of convenience favours the grant of interlocutory relief']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants made out a serious question to be tried as to infringement and validity of their petty patent, and the balance of convenience favoured interlocutory relief since the respondent marketed with full knowledge of the claim; accordingly, an injunction will issue to restrain continued marketing of the allegedly infringing product, pending the bringing in of appropriate orders.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory injunction granted. Applicants to bring in short minutes of order.

Orders

  • ['An injunction will issue to restrain, from an appropriate date, the continued marketing of the Lipton squeezable tea bag by the respondent, pending further orders.' 'Applicants to bring in, on a date to be fixed, short minutes of orders appropriate to reflect the reasons of the Court.']