Casey v Woollahra Municipal Council [2021] NSWLEC 1337

The proposal as amended, having regard to expert concurrence, does not adversely affect heritage significance and satisfies neighbourhood character and amenity objectives, therefore the appeal should be upheld and consent granted subject to conditions.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 09 June 2021
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Outcome: Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Legal Topics: ['development Application' 'heritage Conservation' 'conciliation Conference' 'appeal From Council Refusal']

['planning and Environment Law'] ['development Application' 'heritage Conservation' 'conciliation Conference' 'appeal From Council Refusal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the amended development proposal affects the heritage significance of the property' 'Whether the proposal is compatible with the character and amenity of the neighbourhood']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.

Orders

['The applicant is granted leave to amend the application to rely on amended plans and documents listed under condition A.3 of the conditions of consent at Annexure A.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. 107/2020 for landscaping and associated excavation and the construction of an outdoor terrace,...