Visscher v SafeWork NSW [2022] NSWSC 908
Because the plaintiff conceded, correctly, that the questions in the Notice of Motion did not arise in the judicial review proceedings commenced by Summons, r 28.2 did not permit the Court to identify them as separate questions or set a procedure for answering them, and it was therefore inappropriate to refer them to the Court of Appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Proceedings; Notice of Motion for Separate Determination of Questions and Referral to the Court of Appeal / Procedural Ruling
- Outcome
- The plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 8 March 2022 was dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['separate Determination of Questions' 'referral to the Court of Appeal' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Proceedings; Notice of Motion for Separate Determination of Questions and Referral to the Court of Appeal / Procedural Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the questions identified in the plaintiff's Notice of Motion could be determined separately under r 28.2 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 when they did not arise in the judicial review proceedings." 'Whether those questions and the proceedings should be referred to the Court of Appeal.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the plaintiff conceded, correctly, that the questions in the Notice of Motion did not arise in the judicial review proceedings commenced by Summons, r 28.2 did not permit the Court to identify them as separate questions or set a procedure for answering them, and it was therefore inappropriate to refer them to the Court of Appeal.
Court Disposition
The plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 8 March 2022 was dismissed.
Orders
- ["Dismiss the plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 8 March 2022."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment