Noakes, Raymond Brian v. J. Harvy Holmes & Son & Ors [1978] FCA 10
No valid appeal had been instituted because the notice of appeal was not filed and served within the period required by the rules. The appellant was not entitled to orders as there was non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements.
- Parties
- Respondent Appellant: Raymond Brian Noakes; Applicant Respondent: J. Harvy Holmes & Son & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 1978
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Appeal / Motion to Strike Out Appeal as Incompetent
- Outcome
- No valid appeal lodged; no appeal instituted; costs to applicant-respondent
- Legal Topics
- Time for Appeal, Service of Notice of Appeal, Compliance With Court Rules, Appeal Competency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raymond Brian Noakes
Respondent Appellant
J. Harvy Holmes & Son & Ors.
Applicant Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application in Appeal / Motion to Strike Out Appeal as Incompetent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a valid appeal had been instituted by the filing of the notice of appeal supported by affidavit VG3 of 1978
- 2 Whether the court should make any orders concerning the conduct of the appeal
- 3 Whether the applicant's failure to comply with strict procedural rules should affect the application
Ratio Decidendi
No valid appeal had been instituted because the notice of appeal was not filed and served within the period required by the rules. The appellant was not entitled to orders as there was non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements.
Court Disposition
No valid appeal lodged; no appeal instituted; costs to applicant-respondent
Orders
- Declare no valid appeal has been lodged and no appeal has been instituted by virtue of the filing of the notice of appeal supported by affidavit numbered VG3 of 1978 and filed in the Victorian Registry of the Court on 23 January 1978.
- The costs of the applicant of this application be paid by the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment