R v Pratten (No 11) [2012] NSWSC 1674

R v Pratten (No 11) [2012] NSWSC 1674

Bail is continued as the circumstances affecting the defendant's need for liberty to prepare his case persist and there is no alteration in factors warranting revocation or variation of bail conditions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application During Adjourned Sentence Hearing
Outcome
Bail is continued; no new order as to bail.
Legal Topics
['bail' 'interlocutory Proceedings' 'obtaining Financial Advantage by Deception']
['criminal Law'] ['bail' 'interlocutory Proceedings' 'obtaining Financial Advantage by Deception']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Bail Application During Adjourned Sentence Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether bail should be continued for the defendant pending sentencing after conviction of offences under s 134.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

Bail is continued as the circumstances affecting the defendant's need for liberty to prepare his case persist and there is no alteration in factors warranting revocation or variation of bail conditions.

Court Disposition

Bail is continued; no new order as to bail.

Orders

  • ['The Court makes no order as to bail.']