Sell v Taylor [2019] FCA 572

Sell v Taylor [2019] FCA 572

Plaintiff had no standing to bring claims concerning ISTA shareholdings or officeholdings; claims legally misconceived; defendants would have succeeded in summary judgment, so costs order should be made against plaintiff upon discontinuance.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Commercial and Corporations Corporate Insolvency / Discontinuance Order for Costs
Outcome
Plaintiff granted leave to discontinue; plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
Legal Topics
['standing' 'summary Judgment' 'costs' 'discontinuance' 'shareholdings' 'officeholdings' 'corporate Register']
['corporations Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['standing' 'summary Judgment' 'costs' 'discontinuance' 'shareholdings' 'officeholdings' 'corporate Register']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Commercial and Corporations Corporate Insolvency / Discontinuance Order for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether plaintiff has standing to bring claims regarding ISTA shareholdings and officeholdings' 'Whether summary judgment should be granted against the plaintiff' 'Whether costs should be ordered upon discontinuance']

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff had no standing to bring claims concerning ISTA shareholdings or officeholdings; claims legally misconceived; defendants would have succeeded in summary judgment, so costs order should be made against plaintiff upon discontinuance.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff granted leave to discontinue; plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.

Orders

  • ['Plaintiff has leave to file a notice of discontinuance of the whole of the proceeding.' "Plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of the proceeding."]