In the matter of Bonny Glen Fruits Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1784
The Court approved the provisional liquidators' remuneration because the affidavit evidence, summaries and time records showed that the work had the necessary connection with the provisional liquidation and the powers conferred on the provisional liquidators; the work was required to conduct an ongoing business and deal with complex issues in the context of shareholder dispute; time-based costing was a legitimate starting point; and the remuneration sought was not disproportionate to the assets, work, nature and complexity of the provisional liquidation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations List Application by Provisional Liquidators for Approval of Remuneration / Interlocutory Process Filed 27 September 2019; Orders Made 2 December 2019
- Outcome
- Orders made approving provisional liquidators' remuneration under s 60-16 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations); disbursement application under s 60-20 was not pressed and was deferred.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' 'provisional Liquidators' 'remuneration of External Administrators' 'time Costing' 'disbursements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations List Application by Provisional Liquidators for Approval of Remuneration / Interlocutory Process Filed 27 September 2019; Orders Made 2 December 2019
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the provisional liquidators' remuneration for services from 27 November 2018 to 31 July 2019 should be approved under s 60-16 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations)." 'Whether the work performed had the necessary connection with the provisional liquidation and the powers conferred on the provisional liquidators.' 'Whether remuneration calculated on a time-costing basis was reasonable and proportionate.' 'Whether disbursements containing a profit element should be approved under s 60-20 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations).']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the provisional liquidators' remuneration because the affidavit evidence, summaries and time records showed that the work had the necessary connection with the provisional liquidation and the powers conferred on the provisional liquidators; the work was required to conduct an ongoing business and deal with complex issues in the context of shareholder dispute; time-based costing was a legitimate starting point; and the remuneration sought was not disproportionate to the assets, work, nature and complexity of the provisional liquidation.
Court Disposition
Orders made approving provisional liquidators' remuneration under s 60-16 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations); disbursement application under s 60-20 was not pressed and was deferred.
Orders
- ['Orders 1-4 and 5 in the short minutes of order initialled by the Court were made.' "The Applicants' costs and expenses of the application were ordered to be costs and expenses of the First Defendant." "Liberty to restore on two business days' notice, including in respect of any application in relation to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment