Glover v R [2009] NSWCCA 48
The sentencing judge erred in finding the offence was of the 'worst type' in the absence of Crown submission and in imposing a manifestly excessive sentence, as demonstrated by comparable statistics, the applicant's subjective factors, and his plea of guilty. Accordingly, the sentence was quashed and a less severe sentence imposed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant re-sentenced
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'aggravated Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'objective Seriousness of Offence' 'manifest Excess in Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the offence was correctly characterised as 'of the worst type'" 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred in finding the offence was of the 'worst type' in the absence of Crown submission and in imposing a manifestly excessive sentence, as demonstrated by comparable statistics, the applicant's subjective factors, and his plea of guilty. Accordingly, the sentence was quashed and a less severe sentence imposed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant re-sentenced
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal.' 'Allow the appeal.' 'Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court.' 'In substitution, sentence the applicant to a non-parole period of 8 years to commence on 3 December 2006 with a total term of imprisonment of 12 years to commence on 3 December 2006. The total term will expire on 2...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment