REGINA v GUIDER [2005] NSWCCA 386
The appeal was summarily dismissed because, after the Attorney General referred the petition to the Court, the appellant took no steps to prosecute the appeal, stated he was unable to proceed, and then advised that he did not wish to go ahead with the appeal and would be content for it to be struck out.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by the Registrar Under S19(2) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 for Consideration of Summary Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal summarily dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Dismissal' 'want of Prosecution' 'appeal From Conviction' 'petition Referred to Court of Criminal Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by the Registrar Under S19(2) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 for Consideration of Summary Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be summarily dismissed for want of prosecution.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was summarily dismissed because, after the Attorney General referred the petition to the Court, the appellant took no steps to prosecute the appeal, stated he was unable to proceed, and then advised that he did not wish to go ahead with the appeal and would be content for it to be struck out.
Court Disposition
Appeal summarily dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be summarily dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment