Galea v Stromer [2013] NSWSC 1720
The list statement and list response failed to adequately plead material facts regarding breaches or proportionate liability, thus warranting strike out of the relevant pleadings with leave to replead.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural and Other Rulings / Application to Strike Out Pleadings
- Outcome
- Relevant allegations in the list statement and list response struck out with leave to replead.
- Legal Topics
- ['pleadings' 'apportionable Claim' 'concurrent Liability' 'proportionate Liability']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings / Application to Strike Out Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether allegations in the list statement and list response sufficiently pleaded breaches of duty and claims of proportionate liability.' 'Principles to apply for striking out pleadings in apportionable claim cases under Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
The list statement and list response failed to adequately plead material facts regarding breaches or proportionate liability, thus warranting strike out of the relevant pleadings with leave to replead.
Court Disposition
Relevant allegations in the list statement and list response struck out with leave to replead.
Orders
- ["Relevant portions of the second further amended list statement and of the first and second defendants' list response are struck out." 'Leave granted to replead.' 'Third to sixth defendants each to have the costs orders sought in their notice of motion.' "First and second defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment