TIPPER v WILLIAMS (NO 2) [1994] NSWCA 312
The appropriate deduction from the respondent's damages is the discounted present value of weekly workers' compensation entitlements until retirement, reduced further by a discount for vicissitudes, rather than the lower redemption amount, and credit should be given for compensation payments received after the notional trial date.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tipper; First Respondent: Williams
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Determination of Quantum on Appeal After Remitter for Further Evidence and Calculation
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part. Judgment for the respondent reduced by adjusted calculation.
- Legal Topics
- Workers' Compensation Rights, Future Earning Capacity, Deduction for Compensation Entitlements, Quantum Assessment, Calculation of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tipper
Appellant
Williams
First Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination of Quantum on Appeal After Remitter for Further Evidence and Calculation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge failed to deduct the value of continuing workers' compensation entitlements from damages for loss of future earning capacity
- 2 How the deduction on account of workers' compensation entitlements ought to be valued—by redemption value or discounted weekly payments
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate deduction from the respondent's damages is the discounted present value of weekly workers' compensation entitlements until retirement, reduced further by a discount for vicissitudes, rather than the lower redemption amount, and credit should be given for compensation payments received after the notional trial date.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part. Judgment for the respondent reduced by adjusted calculation.
Orders
- Short minutes to be handed up and final orders to be entered after parties have studied the reasons and submitted agreed minutes, or after further mention if required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment