R v TJH [2001] NSWCCA 433
The sentences imposed and accumulated were within range and appropriately reflected the applicant’s criminality, with no error of sentencing principle; the discounts for pleas and other mitigating factors were adequately applied; and there was no basis for finding further special circumstances. Leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'aggravated Sexual Assault' 'indecent Sexual Assault' 'sexual Offences Against Children' 'failure to Complete Rehabilitation Program' 'accumulation of Sentences' 'special Circumstances in Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive' 'Whether correct starting point for sentence was applied' 'Whether accumulation of sentences was appropriate' 'Whether sentencing Judge erred in finding or not finding special circumstances' 'Assessment of failure to complete Cedar Cottage programme']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed and accumulated were within range and appropriately reflected the applicant’s criminality, with no error of sentencing principle; the discounts for pleas and other mitigating factors were adequately applied; and there was no basis for finding further special circumstances. Leave to appeal was granted but the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment