R v TM [2009] NSWDC 111

R v TM [2009] NSWDC 111

Given the seriousness of the offence, the aggravating features, the prior criminal record, and the fact TM was nearly eighteen, it was appropriate to deal with the matter according to law with a custodial sentence of imprisonment for four and a half years, allowing a 25% discount for an early guilty plea, with a non-parole period set at two years due to special circumstances related to youth and rehabilitation.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Defendant: TM
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Juvenile Justice, Armed Robbery, Sentencing, Plea of Guilty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

TM

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 sentence for armed robbery with a dangerous weapon by a juvenile
  2. 2 whether to deal with juvenile according to law or under Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act
  3. 3 impact on victims

Ratio Decidendi

Given the seriousness of the offence, the aggravating features, the prior criminal record, and the fact TM was nearly eighteen, it was appropriate to deal with the matter according to law with a custodial sentence of imprisonment for four and a half years, allowing a 25% discount for an early guilty plea, with a non-parole period set at two years due to special circumstances related to youth and rehabilitation.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • TM is sentenced to four and a half years imprisonment for armed robbery with a dangerous weapon (from 6 December 2008 to 5 June 2013).
  • Non-parole period is set at two years (from 6 December 2008 to 5 December 2010).