R v TM [2009] NSWDC 111
Given the seriousness of the offence, the aggravating features, the prior criminal record, and the fact TM was nearly eighteen, it was appropriate to deal with the matter according to law with a custodial sentence of imprisonment for four and a half years, allowing a 25% discount for an early guilty plea, with a non-parole period set at two years due to special circumstances related to youth and rehabilitation.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Defendant: TM
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Juvenile Justice, Armed Robbery, Sentencing, Plea of Guilty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
TM
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 sentence for armed robbery with a dangerous weapon by a juvenile
- 2 whether to deal with juvenile according to law or under Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act
- 3 impact on victims
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness of the offence, the aggravating features, the prior criminal record, and the fact TM was nearly eighteen, it was appropriate to deal with the matter according to law with a custodial sentence of imprisonment for four and a half years, allowing a 25% discount for an early guilty plea, with a non-parole period set at two years due to special circumstances related to youth and rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- TM is sentenced to four and a half years imprisonment for armed robbery with a dangerous weapon (from 6 December 2008 to 5 June 2013).
- Non-parole period is set at two years (from 6 December 2008 to 5 December 2010).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment