The Epoch Holding Group Pty Ltd v Carrodus [2022] FCA 947
Non-publication orders are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice where the evidence comprises commercially sensitive and confidential information. The orders previously made should be continued until further order.
- Parties
- First Applicant: The Epoch Holding Group Pty Ltd ACN 169 456 517; Second Applicant: Epoch Capital Pty Ltd ACN 128 329 395; Third Applicant: Epoch Systems Development Pty Ltd ACN 144 882 744; Fourth Applicant: The Epoch Trading Group Pty Ltd ACN 165 280 357; Fifth Applicant: Epoch Services Australia Pty Ltd ACN 639 479 762; Sixth Applicant: Epoch Trading Services Ltd UKCN 11558491; Seventh Applicant: Epoch Capital Ltd UKCN 09184730; Eighth Applicant: Epoch Capital US LLC DFN 4801861; Respondent: Toby Gavin Carrodus
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Orders—continuation of Non Publication Orders
- Outcome
- Non-publication orders continued until further order.
- Legal Topics
- Suppression Orders, Non Publication Orders, Copyright and Confidential Information, Commercially Sensitive Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Epoch Holding Group Pty Ltd ACN 169 456 517
First Applicant
Epoch Capital Pty Ltd ACN 128 329 395
Second Applicant
Epoch Systems Development Pty Ltd ACN 144 882 744
Third Applicant
The Epoch Trading Group Pty Ltd ACN 165 280 357
Fourth Applicant
Epoch Services Australia Pty Ltd ACN 639 479 762
Fifth Applicant
Epoch Trading Services Ltd UKCN 11558491
Sixth Applicant
Epoch Capital Ltd UKCN 09184730
Seventh Applicant
Epoch Capital US LLC DFN 4801861
Eighth Applicant
Toby Gavin Carrodus
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Orders—continuation of Non Publication Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-publication orders should be continued in respect of commercially sensitive evidence
- 2 Necessity of non-publication orders to prevent prejudice to proper administration of justice
Ratio Decidendi
Non-publication orders are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice where the evidence comprises commercially sensitive and confidential information. The orders previously made should be continued until further order.
Court Disposition
Non-publication orders continued until further order.
Orders
- Order 11 of the 12 August Orders is to continue in operation according to its terms, that is, until further order of the Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment