Obradovic v Commissioner For Fair Trading [2007] NSWSC 368

Obradovic v Commissioner For Fair Trading [2007] NSWSC 368

No error of law was demonstrated in the Appeal Panel's decision to reject the plaintiff's application for a contractor licence. The relevant standards of proof were correctly applied, and factual questions were not open to be re-litigated before this Court.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
['contractor Licence' 'standard of Proof' 'appeal on Error of Law']
['administrative Law'] ['contractor Licence' 'standard of Proof' 'appeal on Error of Law']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Appeal Panel erred in law in rejecting the application for a contractor licence' 'Whether the wrong standard of proof was applied by the Tribunal and Appeal Panel' 'Whether plaintiff is a fit and proper person to hold a contractor licence' 'Whether an unreasonable number of complaints and insurance claims were made relevant to applicant']

Ratio Decidendi

No error of law was demonstrated in the Appeal Panel's decision to reject the plaintiff's application for a contractor licence. The relevant standards of proof were correctly applied, and factual questions were not open to be re-litigated before this Court.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed

Orders

  • ['The Summons is dismissed.' 'The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the Summons.']