Pavlarkis T & D v Kiama MC [2004] NSWLEC 729
Despite compliance with applicable planning controls, the excessive bulk and scale of the proposed buildings would be significantly out of character with the existing surrounding development and would fail to respect the existing scale and character as required by the planning instruments. The application was refused for lack of compatibility with the locality.
- Parties
- Applicant: Tom Pavlarkis; Applicant: Dena Pavlarkis; Respondent: Kiama Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; development consent refused
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Residential Character, Dual Occupancy, Subdivision, Building Bulk and Scale
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tom Pavlarkis
Applicant
Dena Pavlarkis
Applicant
Kiama Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development is compatible with the character of the locality in light of statutory planning controls
- 2 Impact of the proposal on residential amenity and solar access
- 3 Compliance with planning controls regarding bulk, scale and character
Ratio Decidendi
Despite compliance with applicable planning controls, the excessive bulk and scale of the proposed buildings would be significantly out of character with the existing surrounding development and would fail to respect the existing scale and character as required by the planning instruments. The application was refused for lack of compatibility with the locality.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; development consent refused
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Development application No 10.2003.526.1, for demolition, subdivision, erection of two attached two-storey dual occupancy buildings and further subdivision at lot A DP 156993, No 21 Campbell Street Gerringong, is determined by refusal of development consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment