Tomoski Developments Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2005] NSWADT 263
Mr Tomoski's repeated breaches of the Home Building Act 1989 and his lack of understanding of the regulatory requirements as a director demonstrate that neither he nor Tomoski Developments can be relied upon to comply with the law. The company is not a fit and proper entity to hold a contractor licence and the decision to refuse the licence is affirmed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. Decision affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['contractor Licensing' 'fit and Proper Person Test' 'home Building Act Compliance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr Tomoski is a fit and proper person to hold a contractor licence given the circumstances surrounding false documentation in 2001 application.' 'Whether breaches of the Home Building Act 1989 by Tomoski Developments and Mr Tomoski demonstrate he is not fit and proper to hold a contractor licence.' 'Whether Tomoski Developments intends to employ a qualified supervisor in compliance with legislative requirements.']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Tomoski's repeated breaches of the Home Building Act 1989 and his lack of understanding of the regulatory requirements as a director demonstrate that neither he nor Tomoski Developments can be relied upon to comply with the law. The company is not a fit and proper entity to hold a contractor licence and the decision to refuse the licence is affirmed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. Decision affirmed.
Orders
- ['The decision of the Commissioner to refuse application by Tomoski Developments Pty Ltd for a contractor licence is affirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment