Brett v Rowland [2017] NSWCATAP 73

Brett v Rowland [2017] NSWCATAP 73

Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal dismissed as the appellant failed to establish an error of law or a substantial miscarriage of justice; arguments merely reiterated prior claims without demonstrating legal error.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
['appeal Grounds' 'breach of Contract' 'australian Consumer Law' 'misleading Representations' 'ncat Internal Appeals']
['consumer Law' 'contract Law'] ['appeal Grounds' 'breach of Contract' 'australian Consumer Law' 'misleading Representations' 'ncat Internal Appeals']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant established an error of law' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted based on substantial miscarriage of justice' 'Compliance with previous Tribunal orders relating to the provision of material and value of work']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal dismissed as the appellant failed to establish an error of law or a substantial miscarriage of justice; arguments merely reiterated prior claims without demonstrating legal error.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal is refused.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']