R v McLennan; Ex parte Carr [1952] HCA 39
The regulations prohibiting exportation of non-ferrous scrap metal unless approved by the Department of Supply and Development were valid under s. 112 of the Customs Act 1901-1949. The Governor-General's power to prohibit exportation included making prohibitions subject to conditions. The administrative discretion to grant approval was a valid condition, not an impermissible delegation. In any event, s. 7 of the Customs Act 1951 retrospectively validated the regulations.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Queen; Respondent: John Henry McLennan; Applicant: Tony Carr
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 1952
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Application for Writ of Prohibition / High Court Appeal From Conviction and Penalty; Application to Make Order Nisi for Prohibition Absolute
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; order nisi for prohibition discharged with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Regulations, Prohibited Exports, Governor General's Power, Delegation of Executive Power, Retrospective Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecutor
John Henry McLennan
Respondent
Tony Carr
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Application for Writ of Prohibition / High Court Appeal From Conviction and Penalty; Application to Make Order Nisi for Prohibition Absolute
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations prohibiting export of non-ferrous scrap metal unless approved by the Department were valid under s. 112 of the Customs Act 1901-1949 as it stood at the time of the alleged offence
- 2 Whether the requirement for Departmental approval was a permissible condition or an invalid delegation of power
- 3 Effect of retrospective legislation (Customs Act 1951 s. 7) on the validity of the regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The regulations prohibiting exportation of non-ferrous scrap metal unless approved by the Department of Supply and Development were valid under s. 112 of the Customs Act 1901-1949. The Governor-General's power to prohibit exportation included making prohibitions subject to conditions. The administrative discretion to grant approval was a valid condition, not an impermissible delegation. In any event, s. 7 of the Customs Act 1951 retrospectively validated the regulations.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; order nisi for prohibition discharged with costs.
Orders
- Order nisi for prohibition in respect of the order of variation made on 21st June 1951 discharged with costs.
- Application for order absolute in the first instance for prohibition in respect of the corresponding provision of the award made on 16th January 1952 refused with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment