Golossian v R [2013] NSWCCA 311
The application for extension of time must be refused as the lengthy and largely unexplained delay, the prejudice caused, and the absence of substantial prospects of success on any proposed ground mean it is not in the interests of justice to grant the extension.
- Parties
- Applicant: Tony Golossian; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Extension of time to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Extension of Time, Unreasonable Verdict, Trial Judge's Summing Up, Recall of Complainant, Prejudice From Bifurcation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tony Golossian
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the verdicts of guilty in relation to each complainant were unreasonable or could not be supported by the evidence
- 2 Whether the trial judge's summing up was unfair and unbalanced
- 3 Whether the trial miscarried due to refusal to recall a complainant to give evidence about telephone messages
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time must be refused as the lengthy and largely unexplained delay, the prejudice caused, and the absence of substantial prospects of success on any proposed ground mean it is not in the interests of justice to grant the extension.
Court Disposition
Extension of time to appeal refused
Orders
- An extension of time to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment