Ibrahim v Taylor [2022] NSWCATAP 308

Ibrahim v Taylor [2022] NSWCATAP 308

No material presented on appeal supported allegations of bias, procedural unfairness, or errors of discretion; grounds of appeal were rejected as unfounded or unsupported; no question of law or basis for leave to appeal established; appeal and application for extension of time were dismissed as appellant had no reasonable prospects of success.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Panel Determination
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; application to extend time dismissed; leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
['allegation of Bias' 'leave to Appeal' 'retaliatory Termination Notice' 'compensation for Breach' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal Panel Determination

  1. 1 ['Whether tribunal was biased' 'Whether decision was unreasonable or against the weight of evidence' 'Procedural fairness—prejudgement allegation' 'Tribunal’s discretion regarding termination notice' 'Leave to appeal: whether grounds raise questions of law']

Ratio Decidendi

No material presented on appeal supported allegations of bias, procedural unfairness, or errors of discretion; grounds of appeal were rejected as unfounded or unsupported; no question of law or basis for leave to appeal established; appeal and application for extension of time were dismissed as appellant had no reasonable prospects of success.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; application to extend time dismissed; leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • ['The application to extend the time for lodging the appeal is dismissed.' 'Leave to appeal is refused.' 'Appeal is dismissed.']