Jedani v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1232
As the parties reached an agreement in accordance with s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the presiding Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could properly make, orders were made to give effect to that agreement, including approving modifications to development consent D/2014/334.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (development Application) / Conciliation Conference—final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; agreement between parties made orders of the Court.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Agreement' 'modification of Development Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (development Application) / Conciliation Conference—final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether agreement between parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 should be disposed in accordance with the decision.' 'Whether modifications to development consent D/2014/334 should be approved.']
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties reached an agreement in accordance with s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the presiding Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could properly make, orders were made to give effect to that agreement, including approving modifications to development consent D/2014/334.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; agreement between parties made orders of the Court.
Orders
- ['The Appeal is upheld.' "Leave be granted to change the Respondent's name from Leichhardt Council to Inner West Council." "The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans as referred to in the conditions of consent contained in Annexure 'A'." "The Modification application filed with the Court pursuant...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment