Krajniw v Minister for the Environment [2016] FCA 141

Krajniw v Minister for the Environment [2016] FCA 141

The application and pleadings disclose no reasonable prospect of success as to any valid claim against the respondents, are largely incomprehensible, scandalous or abusive, seek relief beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court, and lack material facts establishing contraventions of the EPBC Act. Therefore, summary judgment for the respondents is warranted and the proceedings are dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Summary Judgment and to Strike Out Pleadings / Interlocutory Decision (summary Judgment/strike Out Application)
Outcome
Summary judgment entered for the respondents; application dismissed
Legal Topics
['summary Judgment' 'strike Out of Pleadings' 'jurisdiction' 'environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act' 'injunctive Relief']
['practice and Procedure' 'environmental Law'] ['summary Judgment' 'strike Out of Pleadings' 'jurisdiction' 'environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act' 'injunctive Relief']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Summary Judgment and to Strike Out Pleadings / Interlocutory Decision (summary Judgment/strike Out Application)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the applicant's proceedings disclose a reasonable cause of action or have any reasonable prospect of success" 'Whether the pleadings are scandalous, vexatious, or otherwise an abuse of process' 'Whether claimed actions are within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court' 'Whether the respondents engaged in contraventions of Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)' 'Relitigation of issues already decided']

Ratio Decidendi

The application and pleadings disclose no reasonable prospect of success as to any valid claim against the respondents, are largely incomprehensible, scandalous or abusive, seek relief beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court, and lack material facts establishing contraventions of the EPBC Act. Therefore, summary judgment for the respondents is warranted and the proceedings are dismissed.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment entered for the respondents; application dismissed

Orders

  • ['Judgment be entered for the respondents against Mr Tony Krajniw under s 31A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 26.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).' 'Mr Tony Krajniw pay the costs of the respondents of and incidental to these proceedings.']