R v Tony LIRISTIS [2013] NSWDC 223
The appellant acted under extenuating circumstances, having relied on misleading information from a court official regarding his licence status, and made genuine efforts to clarify his disqualification. Given these circumstances, the mandatory penalty would be harsh and unfair, justifying an order under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 and dismissal of the charge without conviction.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tony Liristis; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against sentence upheld
- Legal Topics
- Drive While Disqualified, Appeal Against Sentence, Extenuating Circumstances, Mandatory Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tony Liristis
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentence for driving while disqualified should be set aside and order made under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
- 2 Whether extenuating circumstances justified leniency due to misleading information from court official
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant acted under extenuating circumstances, having relied on misleading information from a court official regarding his licence status, and made genuine efforts to clarify his disqualification. Given these circumstances, the mandatory penalty would be harsh and unfair, justifying an order under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 and dismissal of the charge without conviction.
Court Disposition
Appeal against sentence upheld
Orders
- Sentence set aside under s 20(2) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
- Order under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999: charge dismissed without conviction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment