Inspector Yates v Toorak Winery Pty Ltd [2010] NSWIRComm 136

Inspector Yates v Toorak Winery Pty Ltd [2010] NSWIRComm 136

The defendant was found to have committed a serious breach of its duties under s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 by failing to ensure health and safety at work through inadequate risk assessment, failure to provide safe plant and a safe system of work, and insufficient training and information to employees, leading to the foreseeable risk and occurrence of fatal injury. Although the risk was not 'clearly foreseeable', proper assessment would have revealed it, and practicable measures could have prevented the incident. Mitigating factors include early guilty plea, contrition, remedial action, absence of prior convictions, and cooperation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Prosecution (occupational Health and Safety) / Judgment on Sentence After Guilty Plea
Outcome
Defendant found guilty of breach of s 8(1) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000; conviction entered
Legal Topics
['employer Duties' 'workplace Fatality' 'risk Assessment' 'penalty and Sentencing' 'training and Supervision']
['occupational Health and Safety' 'criminal Law' 'employment Law'] ['employer Duties' 'workplace Fatality' 'risk Assessment' 'penalty and Sentencing' 'training and Supervision']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Prosecution (occupational Health and Safety) / Judgment on Sentence After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant failed to ensure the health, safety and welfare at work of employees, in particular Mr Gooley, as required by s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000' 'Whether the defendant failed to provide safe plant, a safe system of work, adequate risk assessment, adequate information, instruction and training']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant was found to have committed a serious breach of its duties under s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 by failing to ensure health and safety at work through inadequate risk assessment, failure to provide safe plant and a safe system of work, and insufficient training and information to employees, leading to the foreseeable risk and occurrence of fatal injury. Although the risk was not 'clearly foreseeable', proper assessment would have revealed it, and practicable measures could have prevented the incident. Mitigating factors include early guilty plea, contrition, remedial action, absence of prior convictions, and cooperation.

Court Disposition

Defendant found guilty of breach of s 8(1) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000; conviction entered

Orders

  • ['Defendant fined $125,000 with half payable to the prosecutor by way of moiety' "Defendant to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed"]