Topcide Pty Limited v Charter Financial Planning Ltd [2010] FCA 1151
There is credible testimony establishing reason to believe Topcide Pty Limited will be unable to pay costs if unsuccessful. No discretionary factor justifies refusal or lesser security. Security for costs should be ordered as assessed by respondent solicitors, with payment in two stages, and costs of motions awarded to respondents.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Security for Costs / Interlocutory Decision on Motions for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered; costs of motions awarded to respondents; proceedings stayed against respondents if security not given.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'corporations Act 2001 (cth) S 1335' 'discretionary Considerations for Security Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion for Security for Costs / Interlocutory Decision on Motions for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered against corporate applicant Topcide Pty Limited under s 1335 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' "Assessment of the applicant's capacity to meet adverse costs orders" 'Discretionary factors weighing for or against security for costs']
Ratio Decidendi
There is credible testimony establishing reason to believe Topcide Pty Limited will be unable to pay costs if unsuccessful. No discretionary factor justifies refusal or lesser security. Security for costs should be ordered as assessed by respondent solicitors, with payment in two stages, and costs of motions awarded to respondents.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered; costs of motions awarded to respondents; proceedings stayed against respondents if security not given.
Orders
- ['Applicant to give security to First Respondent by payment into Court or irrevocable Australian bank guarantee of $135,000 within 28 days, plus $66,360 not less than 28 days before hearing.' "Applicant to pay First Respondent's costs of and incidental to the motion." 'If security not given, proceeding against First...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment