TPS Group Ltd v The Charthill Group Pty Ltd & Ors [1987] FCA 396
The applicant must provide further and better particulars requested for certain paragraphs of the statement of claim where current pleadings are inadequately particularised, particularly regarding allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, and copyright infringement, as these particulars are necessary for the fair definition of issues and preparation for hearing. Requests seeking evidence rather than particulars will be declined.
- Parties
- Applicant: TPS Group Limited; First Respondent: The Charthill Group Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: John Carlton Young; Third Respondent: Charles Frederick Marfleet; Fourth Respondent: ASD Asset Management Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Damages / Interlocutory Motion for Further and Better Particulars
- Outcome
- Applicant required to provide further and better particulars; applicant to pay respondents' costs of the motion.
- Legal Topics
- S.52 Trade Practices Act, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Fraud, Copyright Infringement, Pleading Particulars
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TPS Group Limited
Applicant
The Charthill Group Pty Ltd
First Respondent
John Carlton Young
Second Respondent
Charles Frederick Marfleet
Third Respondent
ASD Asset Management Pty Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Damages / Interlocutory Motion for Further and Better Particulars
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was required to provide further and better particulars of its statement of claim
- 2 Adequacy of particulars for pleadings alleging breach of contract, negligence, fraud, and copyright infringement
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant must provide further and better particulars requested for certain paragraphs of the statement of claim where current pleadings are inadequately particularised, particularly regarding allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, and copyright infringement, as these particulars are necessary for the fair definition of issues and preparation for hearing. Requests seeking evidence rather than particulars will be declined.
Court Disposition
Applicant required to provide further and better particulars; applicant to pay respondents' costs of the motion.
Orders
- The applicant must, by 20 August 1987, comply with respondents' requests for further and better particulars dated 17 March 1987 of paragraphs 10(a), (b) and (c); 11; 15; 22(a), (b) and (c); and 23 of the statement of claim.
- Applicant to pay respondents' costs of the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment