TQM v Dasein [2004] NSWSC 1216
The adjudicator's decision was held to be void due to denial of natural justice; material decisive to the finding regarding time of service was provided to the adjudicator and not copied to TQM, who was thus denied an opportunity to respond, and the adjudicator failed to consider TQM’s adjudication response as required by the Act.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: TQM Design & Construct Pty Limited; First Defendant: Dasein Constructions Pty Limited (subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement); Second Defendant: National Electrical Communications Association
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Orders Regarding Adjudication Under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 / Final Hearing and Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made restraining enforcement of adjudication determination; costs to plaintiff; leave to join adjudicator as party for formal declaration
- Legal Topics
- Security of Payment, Natural Justice, Adjudication, Service of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TQM Design & Construct Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Dasein Constructions Pty Limited (subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement)
First Defendant
National Electrical Communications Association
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Orders Regarding Adjudication Under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 / Final Hearing and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudication determination under the Act was void due to denial of natural justice
- 2 Whether the adjudication application was served or received by TQM on 28 or 29 October 2004
- 3 Whether adjudicator erred in refusing consideration of TQM's adjudication response
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator's decision was held to be void due to denial of natural justice; material decisive to the finding regarding time of service was provided to the adjudicator and not copied to TQM, who was thus denied an opportunity to respond, and the adjudicator failed to consider TQM’s adjudication response as required by the Act.
Court Disposition
Orders made restraining enforcement of adjudication determination; costs to plaintiff; leave to join adjudicator as party for formal declaration
Orders
- First and second defendants permanently restrained from taking any further steps under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999, other than by withdrawing the application under s 26(2)(a) or making a fresh application under s 26(2)(b), in relation to or as a consequence of the adjudication...
- First defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment