Couley v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [1999] NSWDC 6
The Tribunal made an error of law by interpolating the word "significant" into cl 5 of Sch 1 where the clause provides that relevant disabilities include impaired work or school or other educational performance without requiring that impairment to be significant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Victims Compensation Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Determination of the Victims Compensation Tribunal on a Question of Law
- Outcome
- Matter remitted to the Victims Compensation Tribunal to be determined according to the District Court's construction of cl 5 of Sch 1.
- Legal Topics
- ['disability Under Schedule 1(5)' 'shock' 'impaired Work or School or Other Educational Performance' 'remittal to Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Victims Compensation Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Determination of the Victims Compensation Tribunal on a Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Victims Compensation Tribunal correctly construed "disability" in cl 5 of Sch 1 of the Victims Compensation Act 1996.' 'Whether "impaired work or school or other educational performance" in cl 5 of Sch 1 requires significant impairment.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal made an error of law by interpolating the word "significant" into cl 5 of Sch 1 where the clause provides that relevant disabilities include impaired work or school or other educational performance without requiring that impairment to be significant.
Court Disposition
Matter remitted to the Victims Compensation Tribunal to be determined according to the District Court's construction of cl 5 of Sch 1.
Orders
- ['The matter is remitted to the Tribunal to determine the relevant disabilities to include impaired work or school or other educational performance without determining whether such impairment is significant.' "The respondent is to pay the appellant's costs of the motion and appeal as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment