Regina v D'Amico [2000] NSWCCA 290

Regina v D'Amico [2000] NSWCCA 290

The sentencing judge did not err in assessing the seriousness of the offence, the applicant's motive, or personal circumstances, nor in distinguishing the applicant's case from that of her husband; no error in the exercise of sentencing discretion was demonstrated.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 August 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Sentence' 'drug Offences' 'sentencing Principles']
['criminal Law'] ['appeal Against Sentence' 'drug Offences' 'sentencing Principles']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessing the seriousness of the offence given the applicant's drug addiction" "Whether inadequate weight was given to hardship caused by separation from the applicant's child" 'Whether inadequate recognition was given regarding special circumstances and rehabilitation' 'Whether there was an unwarranted disparity between the sentence imposed on the applicant and that imposed on her husband']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not err in assessing the seriousness of the offence, the applicant's motive, or personal circumstances, nor in distinguishing the applicant's case from that of her husband; no error in the exercise of sentencing discretion was demonstrated.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']