Hammond v JP Morgan Trust Australia Pty Limited [2011] NSWCA 57

Hammond v JP Morgan Trust Australia Pty Limited [2011] NSWCA 57

The appellant's defence, based on the documentation and factual matrix, was not so clearly untenable as to warrant summary judgment. The case did not meet the high threshold for the grant of summary judgment and the appellant was entitled to have the defence tried.

Parties
Appellant: Tracie Hammond; Respondent: JP Morgan Trust Australia Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Mortgage Default, Waiver of Rights
Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Mortgage Default Waiver of Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tracie Hammond

Appellant

JP Morgan Trust Australia Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment should have been granted against the appellant
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's defence was so clearly untenable as to warrant summary judgment
  3. 3 Whether the opportunity for trial was improperly denied

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's defence, based on the documentation and factual matrix, was not so clearly untenable as to warrant summary judgment. The case did not meet the high threshold for the grant of summary judgment and the appellant was entitled to have the defence tried.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed.
  • Orders made by Latham J on 12 December 2008 set aside.