Trade Practices Commission v CC (New South Wales) Pty Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 625
The applicant was wholly successful on the issues that occupied the hearing, and neither the narrowing of categories sought nor the exclusion of s 155 documents displaces the usual rule that costs follow the event; therefore, the respondents must pay the applicant's costs of the motion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Discovery / Costs Decision After Determination of Discovery Motions
- Outcome
- Respondents to the Commission's motion for discovery to pay costs of that motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'costs' 'trade Practices Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion for Discovery / Costs Decision After Determination of Discovery Motions
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondents should pay the applicant's costs of the motion for discovery" 'Whether the result of applicant not obtaining discovery in full should affect the costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was wholly successful on the issues that occupied the hearing, and neither the narrowing of categories sought nor the exclusion of s 155 documents displaces the usual rule that costs follow the event; therefore, the respondents must pay the applicant's costs of the motion.
Court Disposition
Respondents to the Commission's motion for discovery to pay costs of that motion.
Orders
- ["Order in terms of paragraphs 1–8 of short minutes of orders handed up, with the addition of the words to paragraphs 2 and 3: 'and excepting the documents referred to in category number 12 in the annexure.'"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment