Trade Practices Commission v. Olympic Productions & Publications Pty Ltd & Anor [1985] FCA 664
The Federal Court has jurisdiction to accept undertakings offered by respondents in lieu of injunctions under s.80 of the Trade Practices Act 1974, provided the undertakings correspond to conduct covered by the Act and the applicant accepts them, even in the absence of express admissions or proof of contravention.
- Parties
- Applicant: Trade Practices Commission; First Respondent: Olympic Productions and Publications Pty.Ltd.; Second Respondent: Paramount Productions Pty.Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Injunction / Final Determination on Acceptance of Undertakings and Costs
- Outcome
- Undertakings accepted in lieu of injunctions; no order as to costs, including reserved costs.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Jurisdiction to Accept Undertakings, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trade Practices Commission
Applicant
Olympic Productions and Publications Pty.Ltd.
First Respondent
Paramount Productions Pty.Ltd.
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Injunction / Final Determination on Acceptance of Undertakings and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to accept undertakings in lieu of injunctive relief without admission or proof of contravening conduct under s.80 of the Trade Practices Act 1974
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court has jurisdiction to accept undertakings offered by respondents in lieu of injunctions under s.80 of the Trade Practices Act 1974, provided the undertakings correspond to conduct covered by the Act and the applicant accepts them, even in the absence of express admissions or proof of contravention.
Court Disposition
Undertakings accepted in lieu of injunctions; no order as to costs, including reserved costs.
Orders
- On undertakings offered by each of the respondents, through counsel, there be no order as to costs, including reserved costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment