Trade Practices Commission v International Technology Holdings Pty Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 58
The respondents did not present sufficient evidence of relevant change in circumstances since giving the undertakings, nor established a basis for relief under the Patents Act. The notice of motion to be released from undertakings and for relief was accordingly dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Motion Within Injunctive Proceedings / Hearing and Determination of Respondents' Notice of Motion Seeking Release From Undertakings
- Outcome
- Respondents' notice of motion dismissed; respondents ordered to pay applicant's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion; leave to applicant to tax these costs refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'injunctive Relief' 'undertakings to the Court' 'patent Infringement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Motion Within Injunctive Proceedings / Hearing and Determination of Respondents' Notice of Motion Seeking Release From Undertakings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether respondents should be released from undertakings given to the court to refrain from making certain representations' 'Whether circumstances have sufficiently changed to justify the release of undertakings' 'Whether there is a basis for relief under s.97(3) Patents Act 1990']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents did not present sufficient evidence of relevant change in circumstances since giving the undertakings, nor established a basis for relief under the Patents Act. The notice of motion to be released from undertakings and for relief was accordingly dismissed.
Court Disposition
Respondents' notice of motion dismissed; respondents ordered to pay applicant's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion; leave to applicant to tax these costs refused.
Orders
- ["The respondents' notice of motion is dismissed." "The respondents shall pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion." 'Leave to the applicant to tax these costs is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment