Trade Practices Commission v International Technology Holdings Pty Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 58

Trade Practices Commission v International Technology Holdings Pty Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 58

The respondents did not present sufficient evidence of relevant change in circumstances since giving the undertakings, nor established a basis for relief under the Patents Act. The notice of motion to be released from undertakings and for relief was accordingly dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 February 1995
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Motion Within Injunctive Proceedings / Hearing and Determination of Respondents' Notice of Motion Seeking Release From Undertakings
Outcome
Respondents' notice of motion dismissed; respondents ordered to pay applicant's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion; leave to applicant to tax these costs refused.
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'injunctive Relief' 'undertakings to the Court' 'patent Infringement']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Motion Within Injunctive Proceedings / Hearing and Determination of Respondents' Notice of Motion Seeking Release From Undertakings

  1. 1 ['Whether respondents should be released from undertakings given to the court to refrain from making certain representations' 'Whether circumstances have sufficiently changed to justify the release of undertakings' 'Whether there is a basis for relief under s.97(3) Patents Act 1990']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents did not present sufficient evidence of relevant change in circumstances since giving the undertakings, nor established a basis for relief under the Patents Act. The notice of motion to be released from undertakings and for relief was accordingly dismissed.

Court Disposition

Respondents' notice of motion dismissed; respondents ordered to pay applicant's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion; leave to applicant to tax these costs refused.

Orders

  • ["The respondents' notice of motion is dismissed." "The respondents shall pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to the notice of motion." 'Leave to the applicant to tax these costs is refused.']