Trade Practices Commission v. Axive P/L & Ors [1994] FCA 983
Respondents contravened s.45 and s.45A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 by entering into price-fixing arrangements at industry meetings, but ignorance, lack of implementation, co-operation, or minimal involvement warrant penalties aligned with previously imposed amounts and considering personal circumstances; nominal penalties are justified for parties of minimal involvement and significant mitigating factors. Permanent injunctions mark illegality of the arrangement.
- Parties
- Applicant: Trade Practices Commission; First Respondent: Axive Pty Ltd (Trading as Newcastle Ice & Cold Storage); Second Respondent: Mr Haydon; Seventh Respondent: Abbco; Director of Abbco, Seventh Respondent: Mr Scott; Twelfth Respondent: Lidcombe Ice (Mr Jeffree); Fifteenth Respondent: Mr Tite; Twentieth Respondent: Mrs Tite
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Penalties Action / Judgment on Penalties and Orders
- Outcome
- Penalties imposed, permanent injunction granted, and costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Price Fixing, Civil Penalties, Cartel Conduct, Trade Practices, Market Competition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trade Practices Commission
Applicant
Axive Pty Ltd (Trading as Newcastle Ice & Cold Storage)
First Respondent
Mr Haydon
Second Respondent
Abbco
Seventh Respondent
Mr Scott
Director of Abbco, Seventh Respondent
Lidcombe Ice (Mr Jeffree)
Twelfth Respondent
Mr Tite
Fifteenth Respondent
Mrs Tite
Twentieth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalties Action / Judgment on Penalties and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conduct at meetings breached s.45 and s.45A of the Trade Practices Act 1974
- 2 What penalties are appropriate for contravention
- 3 Application of discount for co-operation
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents contravened s.45 and s.45A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 by entering into price-fixing arrangements at industry meetings, but ignorance, lack of implementation, co-operation, or minimal involvement warrant penalties aligned with previously imposed amounts and considering personal circumstances; nominal penalties are justified for parties of minimal involvement and significant mitigating factors. Permanent injunctions mark illegality of the arrangement.
Court Disposition
Penalties imposed, permanent injunction granted, and costs ordered.
Orders
- Axive Pty Ltd: penalty of $2,500
- Mr Haydon: penalty of $750
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment