Trade Practices Commission v Optus Communications Pty Ltd & Anor [1995] FCA 649
Where resolution of contempt proceedings requires determination of a major issue in the main suit, the contempt application should usually be adjourned until the final hearing of the principal proceedings, unless special circumstances are demonstrated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Directions Hearing Regarding Scheduling of Final Hearing and Contempt Application
- Outcome
- Final hearing of the main civil proceedings set down first; hearing of contempt application adjourned to a later date.
- Legal Topics
- ['scheduling of Contempt Proceedings' 'expedition of Main Proceedings' 'public Interest in Scheduling' 'adjournment of Contempt Hearing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Directions Hearing Regarding Scheduling of Final Hearing and Contempt Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether contempt proceedings should be heard before the final hearing of the main proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Where resolution of contempt proceedings requires determination of a major issue in the main suit, the contempt application should usually be adjourned until the final hearing of the principal proceedings, unless special circumstances are demonstrated.
Court Disposition
Final hearing of the main civil proceedings set down first; hearing of contempt application adjourned to a later date.
Orders
- ['The final hearing of the civil proceedings take place on 26 September 1995 and continue for the duration of that week.' 'Hearing of the contempt application will be at a later date.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment