Trade Practices Commission v C.G. Smith Pty Ltd & Ors [1978] FCA 6

Trade Practices Commission v C.G. Smith Pty Ltd & Ors [1978] FCA 6

Mr. Fairweather was aware before 21st July 1977 that settlement would involve undertakings regarding refunds by the Company, Mr. Matson and himself; he left it to Mr. Matson and Mr. Hilbery to obtain the best terms; Mr. Hilbery was justified in relying on instructions from Mr. Matson and Mrs. Coonan and had authority to give the undertakings; Mr. Fairweather took the benefit of the consent orders; the orders were entered and the Commission's proceedings were finalised and could not be revived. The application to be discharged from the undertaking was therefore dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 February 1978
Procedural Posture
Procedure Application to Be Discharged From Undertaking to Court / Judgment on Mr. Fairweather's Application to Be Discharged From Undertaking
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['undertakings to the Court' "counsel's Authority" 'consent Orders' 'contempt Motion' 'trade Practices Act 1974']
['procedure' 'trade Practices'] ['undertakings to the Court' "counsel's Authority" 'consent Orders' 'contempt Motion' 'trade Practices Act 1974']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Procedure Application to Be Discharged From Undertaking to Court / Judgment on Mr. Fairweather's Application to Be Discharged From Undertaking

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Mr. Fairweather should be discharged from an undertaking given to the Court on 21st July 1977.' 'Whether Mr. Hilbery had authority to give undertakings on behalf of Mr. Fairweather as part of the settlement.' 'Whether alleged lack of knowledge, consent, instructions, or information about financial difficulty justified discharging the undertaking.']

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Fairweather was aware before 21st July 1977 that settlement would involve undertakings regarding refunds by the Company, Mr. Matson and himself; he left it to Mr. Matson and Mr. Hilbery to obtain the best terms; Mr. Hilbery was justified in relying on instructions from Mr. Matson and Mrs. Coonan and had authority to give the undertakings; Mr. Fairweather took the benefit of the consent orders; the orders were entered and the Commission's proceedings were finalised and could not be revived. The application to be discharged from the undertaking was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Application dismissed with costs.']