Trade Practices Commission v Milreis Pty Ltd & Ors [1978] FCA 38
The Court had jurisdiction to make the sought orders and accept undertakings pursuant to the settlements, as rights accrued and proceedings commenced before the amendment and repeal of s.45 of the Trade Practices Act were preserved by s.8 of the Acts Interpretation Act. No contrary intention appeared in the amended legislation. Effect on third parties did not preclude making the orders where they were otherwise appropriate.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Trade Practices Commission; Defendant: Milreis Pty. Ltd. & Ors.; Added Party: Thomson Publications (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 1978
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Hearing, Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- orders made by consent; undertakings accepted; order for payment of costs
- Legal Topics
- Consent Orders, Effect of Change in Legislation, Injunctions, Settlement, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trade Practices Commission
Plaintiff
Milreis Pty. Ltd. & Ors.
Defendant
Thomson Publications (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
Added Party
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Hearing, Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Can the Court make consent orders and accept undertakings following settlement terms, given amendments to the Trade Practices Act and repeal/substitution of s.45?
- 2 Does s.8 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 preserve rights accrued before amendment of the Trade Practices Act?
- 3 Is there a contrary intention in the amending Act preventing application of s.8 of the Acts Interpretation Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court had jurisdiction to make the sought orders and accept undertakings pursuant to the settlements, as rights accrued and proceedings commenced before the amendment and repeal of s.45 of the Trade Practices Act were preserved by s.8 of the Acts Interpretation Act. No contrary intention appeared in the amended legislation. Effect on third parties did not preclude making the orders where they were otherwise appropriate.
Court Disposition
orders made by consent; undertakings accepted; order for payment of costs
Orders
- The 16th Defendant, by itself, its servants and agents, restrained from circulating recommended prices for liquor from licensed hotel premises, or being party to formulation, approval, or recommendation of such prices;
- Restraint from circulating prices for liquor as recommended prices to public from licensed hotel premises or being party to such circulation;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment