Kimberly-Clark Corporation v Vereinigte Papierwerke Schikedanz & Co [1967] HCA 45
Registration of 'Coldex' in class 5 rejected due to likelihood of confusion with 'Kotex'. Registration in class 16 permitted only with amended descriptions ('table-napkins' for 'napkins' and 'babies-napkins' for 'diapers') to avoid overlap and resultant confusion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Hearing (original Jurisdiction)
- Outcome
- Appeal in case No. 7 of 1965 allowed (application 167606 refused); decision in case No. 8 of 1965 (application 167607) set aside, registration ordered with amendments; respondent to pay three fifths of appellant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['trade Marks' 'deceptive Similarity' 'registration of Trade Marks']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing (original Jurisdiction)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trade mark 'Coldex' is deceptively similar to 'Kotex'." "Whether registration of 'Coldex' should be refused for certain goods due to likely deception or confusion under the Trade Marks Act 1955-1966 (Cth)." "Whether 'Coldex' is disentitled to protection as a trade mark due to descriptiveness or inherent qualities."]
Ratio Decidendi
Registration of 'Coldex' in class 5 rejected due to likelihood of confusion with 'Kotex'. Registration in class 16 permitted only with amended descriptions ('table-napkins' for 'napkins' and 'babies-napkins' for 'diapers') to avoid overlap and resultant confusion.
Court Disposition
Appeal in case No. 7 of 1965 allowed (application 167606 refused); decision in case No. 8 of 1965 (application 167607) set aside, registration ordered with amendments; respondent to pay three fifths of appellant's costs.
Orders
- ["Application No. 167606 for registration of 'Coldex' in class 5 refused." 'Decision of Assistant Registrar in Application No. 167607 set aside.' "Order that the trade mark 'Coldex' be registered in respect of 'goods made from paper or pulp as substitutes for textile goods, namely face-cloths, handkerchiefs,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment