Transfield Pty Limited v National Vulcan Engineering Insurance Group Limited & Ors Connell Wagner Pty Ltd v National Vulcan Engineering Insurance Group Ltd & Ors [2002] NSWSC 830
Exclusion 3(b) in Section C of the policy operates only to exclude indemnity for damage to property owned by the insured entity making the claim. Therefore, each claimant insured is entitled to indemnity under Section C in relation to claims for damage to property owned by other insureds, and the insurer did not make a binding election to grant indemnity to Transfield based on its conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Insurance Coverage Dispute / Determination of Separate Questions Based on Agreed Statement of Facts
- Outcome
- Declaration granted; each plaintiff insured is entitled to indemnity for claims relating to damage to property owned by other insured entities. The insurer did not make a binding election by its conduct.
- Legal Topics
- ['contract Interpretation' 'indemnity' 'exclusions Clause' 'composite Policy' 'cross Liability Clause' 'election']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Insurance Coverage Dispute / Determination of Separate Questions Based on Agreed Statement of Facts
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Exclusion 3(b) in Section C of the Contractors' Floater Policy No 95050032 excludes indemnity where a party insured under the policy causes damage to property owned by another insured party" 'Whether underwriters made a binding election to grant indemnity to Transfield pursuant to Section C of the Policy in respect of the claims for liability arising out of damage to property of Pearce and Elliott']
Ratio Decidendi
Exclusion 3(b) in Section C of the policy operates only to exclude indemnity for damage to property owned by the insured entity making the claim. Therefore, each claimant insured is entitled to indemnity under Section C in relation to claims for damage to property owned by other insureds, and the insurer did not make a binding election to grant indemnity to Transfield based on its conduct.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted; each plaintiff insured is entitled to indemnity for claims relating to damage to property owned by other insured entities. The insurer did not make a binding election by its conduct.
Orders
- ['Transfield Pty Limited is entitled to indemnity under Section C for claims relating to its liability for damage to property of Pearce and Elliott.' 'Connell Wagner Pty Ltd is entitled to indemnity under Section C for claims relating to its liability for damage to property of Transfield, Pearce, and Elliott.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment