R v Davies [2000] NSWCCA 84
The evidence was capable of supporting the jury's verdict that the appellant drove through a red traffic light in a grossly irresponsible manner, causing the death of a pedestrian. The sentence imposed was within the appropriate range considering the seriousness of the offence, community concern, and the absence of error by the sentencing judge as per the guidelines established in R v Jurisic.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From District Court
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['dangerous Driving' 'sentencing' 'appellate Review' 'culpable Driving Causing Death']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the verdict of the jury was unreasonable having regard to the evidence' 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or affected by error']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence was capable of supporting the jury's verdict that the appellant drove through a red traffic light in a grossly irresponsible manner, causing the death of a pedestrian. The sentence imposed was within the appropriate range considering the seriousness of the offence, community concern, and the absence of error by the sentencing judge as per the guidelines established in R v Jurisic.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed' 'Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed' 'Sentence of imprisonment imposed by the District Court confirmed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment