Prentice & Barila v Treetop Projects Ltd [2006] NSWSC 999
The interest of justice is better served by adhering to the ordinary rule that matters are dealt with in open court and on notice rather than ex parte for the purpose of maintaining forensic advantage.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Application rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'interrogatories' 'ex Parte Applications']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether application for leave to use documents from Supreme Court proceedings in District Court proceedings should be heard ex parte']
Ratio Decidendi
The interest of justice is better served by adhering to the ordinary rule that matters are dealt with in open court and on notice rather than ex parte for the purpose of maintaining forensic advantage.
Court Disposition
Application rejected.
Orders
- ['Orders made for service on interested parties.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment