Madden v R [2011] NSWCCA 254
No error has been demonstrated in the sentencing judge’s approach to the principle of totality, consideration of delay, or failure to inquire further into other offences. Leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed as all grounds fail and nothing in the current or subsequent law changes the outcome.
- Parties
- Appellant: Trent Madden; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Aggravated Break Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence, Serious Indictable Offence of Stealing, Circumstance of Aggravation—in Company, Principle of Totality, Delay Between Offence and Arrest, Standard Non Parole Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trent Madden
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly take into account the principle of totality
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly take into account the delay in sentencing
- 3 Whether the sentencing judge failed to inquire further into the nature of the previous offending
Ratio Decidendi
No error has been demonstrated in the sentencing judge’s approach to the principle of totality, consideration of delay, or failure to inquire further into other offences. Leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed as all grounds fail and nothing in the current or subsequent law changes the outcome.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment