Towney v R [2018] NSWCCA 65
The jury directions as a whole—both in writing and orally—correctly conveyed the onus and standard of proof borne by the Crown regarding self-defence and intent, and the sequence of jury questions did not result in a miscarriage of justice; no substantial miscarriage was occasioned as there was insufficient evidence...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Leave granted to advance ground 1. Leave refused for ground 2.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'self Defence' 'jury Directions' 'burden of Proof' 'provocation' 'appeal Procedure']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether trial judge's directions on self-defence misstated the burden of proof and standard required of the Crown." 'Whether sequencing of issues in the jury directions (self-defence before intent) amounted to an error causing a miscarriage of justice.']
Ratio Decidendi
The jury directions as a whole—both in writing and orally—correctly conveyed the onus and standard of proof borne by the Crown regarding self-defence and intent, and the sequence of jury questions did not result in a miscarriage of justice; no substantial miscarriage was occasioned as there was insufficient evidence supporting self-defence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Leave granted to advance ground 1. Leave refused for ground 2.
Orders
- ['In respect of Ground of Appeal 1, leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.' 'In respect of Ground of Appeal 2, leave to raise this ground is refused pursuant to r 4 of the Criminal Appeal Rules.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment