McIvor v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 258
The applicant was not presently a fit and proper person to hold a Contractor Licence because his serious criminal convictions, current parole status, lack of remorse or insight, failure to accept responsibility, absence of evidence of rehabilitation or supportive community references, and likely negative community reputation meant the respondent could not assure the public that he was a person of good character, honesty or integrity. The correct and preferable decision was to affirm the refusal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review of Refusal of Application for an Individual Contractor Licence Under the Home Building Act 1989 / Tribunal Review of Internal Review Decision
- Outcome
- The respondent's decision to refuse the applicant's application for a Contractor Licence under the Act is affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['contractor Licence' 'fit and Proper Person' 'criminal Convictions' 'parole' 'rehabilitation' 'community Confidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review of Refusal of Application for an Individual Contractor Licence Under the Home Building Act 1989 / Tribunal Review of Internal Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant was a fit and proper person to hold a Contractor Licence under the Home Building Act 1989' "Whether the applicant's criminal convictions, current parole status, lack of remorse and lack of evidence of rehabilitation justified refusal of the licence application"]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was not presently a fit and proper person to hold a Contractor Licence because his serious criminal convictions, current parole status, lack of remorse or insight, failure to accept responsibility, absence of evidence of rehabilitation or supportive community references, and likely negative community reputation meant the respondent could not assure the public that he was a person of good character, honesty or integrity. The correct and preferable decision was to affirm the refusal.
Court Disposition
The respondent's decision to refuse the applicant's application for a Contractor Licence under the Act is affirmed.
Orders
- ["The respondent's decision to refuse the applicant's application for a Contractor Licence under the Act is affirmed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment