Hall v Hannaford [1999] NSWSC 838

Hall v Hannaford [1999] NSWSC 838

Defendant's particulars for justification and comment were inadequate and overly general, failing to specify facts, matters, and circumstances as required. The defence of contextual truth was improperly pleaded by pleading back plaintiff's imputations, contrary to s 16 Defamation Act. Orders made for better particulars and striking out contextual truth paragraph in Defence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 August 1999
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Adequacy of Particulars and Pleadings
Outcome
Plaintiff's application substantially succeeded; orders made for better particulars and costs.
Legal Topics
['justification' 'adequacy of Particulars' 'contextual Truth' 'comment' 'sufficiency of Particulars']
['defamation'] ['justification' 'adequacy of Particulars' 'contextual Truth' 'comment' 'sufficiency of Particulars']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Adequacy of Particulars and Pleadings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Adequacy of particulars of justification' 'Requirement to particularise facts, matters and circumstances supporting defences' 'Whether contextual truth defence is properly pleaded under s 16 of Defamation Act 1974' 'Sufficiency and proper identification of materials relied upon for comment defence']

Ratio Decidendi

Defendant's particulars for justification and comment were inadequate and overly general, failing to specify facts, matters, and circumstances as required. The defence of contextual truth was improperly pleaded by pleading back plaintiff's imputations, contrary to s 16 Defamation Act. Orders made for better particulars and striking out contextual truth paragraph in Defence.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application substantially succeeded; orders made for better particulars and costs.

Orders

  • ['Defendant to deliver a Verified List of Documents within 14 days.' 'Defendant to provide further and better particulars of justification defence under s 15 of Defamation Act within 14 days.' 'Defendant to provide further and better particulars of comment defence within 14 days.' 'Paragraph 8 of Defence to Amended...