Pargeter v Pargeter [2024] NSWSC 675
The proper apportionment of the burden of provision reflects relevant concessions, the testamentary scheme, and the evaluative judgment of the Court: first $100,000 borne by Richard Pargeter, balance $50,000 borne pro rata by specific legatees other than Mark Hillman; portable life estate provision to be borne by residuary beneficiaries pro rata to their interests.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Claim / Post Settlement Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made regarding apportionment of provision from estate specific legacies and residuary estate.
- Legal Topics
- ['family Provision' 'burden of Provision' 'settlement' 'specific Legacies' 'residuary Estate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim / Post Settlement Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Where the burden of family provision should lie in a settled claim' 'Whether provision is to come out of specific legacies or the residuary estate']
Ratio Decidendi
The proper apportionment of the burden of provision reflects relevant concessions, the testamentary scheme, and the evaluative judgment of the Court: first $100,000 borne by Richard Pargeter, balance $50,000 borne pro rata by specific legatees other than Mark Hillman; portable life estate provision to be borne by residuary beneficiaries pro rata to their interests.
Court Disposition
Orders made regarding apportionment of provision from estate specific legacies and residuary estate.
Orders
- ["Of the 'lump sum' provision, first $100,000 to be borne by Richard Pargeter; balance of $50,000 to be borne pro rata by specified legatees as proportion of $310,000." 'Portable life estate provision to be borne by residuary beneficiaries pro rata according to their interest in the residue, with Alexander Nott...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment