Tribeca Property Developers Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2018] NSWLEC 1344
The proceedings were disposed of by consent under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, as the agreement between parties was acceptable and the Court was satisfied it could have made such a decision in the proper exercise of its function. No merit assessment of the original dispute was made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld by consent
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'variation of Development Standards' 'costs' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the amended plans may be relied upon' 'Whether variations to minimum lot size and maximum building height standards should be upheld' 'Whether the appeal against refusal should be upheld' 'Costs payable for amendments not minor under s 8.15(3) Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were disposed of by consent under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, as the agreement between parties was acceptable and the Court was satisfied it could have made such a decision in the proper exercise of its function. No merit assessment of the original dispute was made.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld by consent
Orders
- ['Applicant granted leave to rely on amended plans and documents as filed with the Court on 6 July 2018 and referred to in condition 1 of Annexure A.' "The amendments to the plans are not minor; Applicant to pay Respondent's costs in the sum of $6000.00 within 21 days pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment