GRUNDT & ORE. V. GREAT BOULDER PTY GOLD MINES LTD 1/1937

GRUNDT & ORE. V. GREAT BOULDER PTY GOLD MINES LTD 1/1937

The application should be dismissed as there is no reason to alter the judgment, having regard to the fact that the date fixed was based on evidence fully canvassed and no justification appears for re-opening the findings or amending the costs order.

Parties
Respondent: Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd; Applicant: Tributers
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 November 1937
Procedural Posture
Application / Post Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Variation of Judgment, Costs, Re Opening Findings
Civil Procedure Variation of Judgment Costs Re Opening Findings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd

Respondent

Tributers

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Application / Post Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the date fixed by the Court concerning the awareness of the respondent should be varied
  2. 2 Whether there are grounds to vary the order for costs

Ratio Decidendi

The application should be dismissed as there is no reason to alter the judgment, having regard to the fact that the date fixed was based on evidence fully canvassed and no justification appears for re-opening the findings or amending the costs order.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs.